01-4034896info@cma.com.np
Sitapaila, Kathmandu, Nepal

Income Tax

Tax Residency in Nepal — Individuals and Entities

Tax residence is assessed under the Act for the relevant income year. Citizenship, immigration status and a bank account can be evidence, but none replaces the individual or entity test.

1. Residency is a legal test

Tax residency determines the reach of the income-tax computation. Under the Act, resident persons are generally assessed on their worldwide taxable income, while non-residents require Nepal-source analysis. Citizenship, a Nepal PAN and the location of one bank account do not independently settle residency. Analyse each income year and distinguish an individual's test from the test for an entity.

The individual definition includes normal abode, presence in Nepal for 183 days or more within a continuous 365-day period, and specified Nepal-government personnel posted abroad. The entity definition includes incorporation under Nepal law and specified management or establishment connections. Read the exact definition for the entity type; a foreign shareholder does not make a Nepal-incorporated company non-resident.

2. Prepare a residency file

PersonFacts to collectQuestion to resolve
IndividualTravel dates, normal home, family and employment arrangementsWhich statutory test is met, and for which year?
Nepal companyIncorporation certificate and constitutional recordsIs it resident under the incorporation limb?
Foreign entityManagement decisions, operating locations and legal formDoes a management or other resident-entity test apply?
Treaty claimantDomestic residency analysis and exact treaty textIs treaty residence different from domestic status?

A treaty tie-breaker is relevant only under an applicable treaty and its conditions. It does not erase the domestic analysis. A residence certificate provides evidence for the period and purpose stated; it is not a universal exemption certificate.

3. Nepal example

A Nepal-incorporated consultancy has all shareholders living overseas and receives fees from foreign customers. Its shareholders' locations do not override incorporation in Nepal when testing the company's residency. The consultancy separately analyses income classification, export treatment, foreign withholding and credit eligibility. Each shareholder's dividend and personal-residency position is a different computation.

For an individual travelling repeatedly, construct a dated arrival/departure schedule rather than adding the current financial year's days and assuming the statutory rolling-period test has been completed. Retain passport or immigration evidence and explain treatment of boundary dates. A foreign employee spending time in Nepal must also consider the source of employment income even if non-resident.

4. Filing consequences and common mistakes

Resident status does not mean all receipts are taxable without exclusions; apply the relevant inclusion and exemption provisions. Non-resident status does not mean all Nepal-connected receipts are exempt. Permanent-establishment, Nepal-source payment and withholding rules remain separate questions.

Before filing, reconcile foreign income, foreign tax paid, currency conversion and treaty relief to the residency conclusion. Record unresolved facts explicitly. Do not claim a foreign-tax credit merely because a bank deducted money overseas; establish the nature of the foreign tax, the qualifying income and the statutory credit limitation.

5. Build the individual’s timeline

Record entry and exit dates, place of normal abode, employment, accommodation and relevant government posting. Reconcile the travel log with reliable records before applying the presence test. A continuous 365-day period is different from counting only days appearing in one calendar year, and a conclusion based on one income year should not be copied indefinitely. For illustration, a person is present in Nepal for 100 days on one visit and 90 days on another within the relevant continuous 365-day period. That is 190 days, not two separate short visits excluded from the count. The statutory test and other residence limbs must still be applied; the example does not settle treaty residence or every person's circumstances.

6. Companies and effective management

For an entity, inspect incorporation, governing documents, management decisions and the applicable statutory category. A foreign incorporation certificate cannot resolve whether effective management is in Nepal. A director’s physical location is relevant evidence, but the location of one video meeting is not the whole analysis. Document who makes material decisions and where the business is actually managed. A Nepal permanent establishment of a nonresident person also has a defined place in the Act’s resident-entity framework, while the foreign person and PE income attribution require their separate rules. Avoid treating a branch as identical to an independent locally incorporated subsidiary.

7. Dual residence and evidence

Where two jurisdictions regard a person as resident, inspect the applicable treaty and its residence provision. An overseas certificate may support a treaty claim for a specified period without cancelling domestic Nepal obligations automatically. Keep the domestic conclusion and treaty analysis separately reasoned. Review residency when an employee relocates, a founder moves management abroad or a foreign project team begins work in Nepal. Update payroll, withholding, return and foreign-income treatment consistently. One form declaring “nonresident” should not silently override the company’s other records showing a different factual position.

Official sources

Before using this guide

Source review: 12 October 2026

The sources support the scope of this general guide. Before applying it, check the actual entity, transaction, reporting period and any later amendment.

Checks for your case
  • Apply the cited provisions to the actual entity, transaction and period. Use the relevant authority’s current forms, instructions and accepted decision for a real filing.

Last updated: 13 October 2026Updated by: C.M. & Associates

Latest update
  1. 13 October 2026

    Editor: C.M. & Associates

    Updated the article presentation and navigation. The cited source-review dates and any transaction-specific limitations still apply.