Sector & Operational Compliance
Income Tax Records, Late Filing, Interest and Penalties in Nepal
Primary law: Income Tax Act, 2058 — Sections 81 and 117–122
Nepal's Income Tax Act requires taxpayers to maintain sufficient records to support:
income-tax returns;
tax payable; and
deductions claimed.
Unless IRD specifies otherwise, Section 81 requires relevant records to be retained for at least:
1. Records and statutory retention
Five years from the end of the relevant income year.
The statutory Section 81 text also requires the records to be maintained in Nepal.
Late returns, inadequate records, underpaid instalment tax and overdue tax can trigger different fees and interest. They should not all be described simply as a “fine”.
What Records Must Be Maintained?
Section 81 broadly requires:
Return-supporting records
Information and documents supporting returns and other documents submitted to IRD.
Tax-computation records
Documents necessary to determine tax payable.
Deduction records
Documents supporting expenditure/deductions claimed.
IRD's Transfer Pricing Directive repeats these Section 81 requirements and specifically requires relevant documents to be maintained so that they are readily available for IRD inspection.
Five-Year Retention Period
Unless IRD specifies another period by written notice:
records must be safely retained for at least five years from the end of the relevant income year.
Example
Income year: FY 2083/84
Do not destroy tax records immediately after filing the return or obtaining tax clearance.
The statutory five-year retention clock must first be completed, and longer retention may be prudent where there is:
assessment;
litigation;
asset cost history;
carried-forward losses;
long-term contract;
related-party issue;
other continuing tax relevance.
2. Electronic and foreign-language records
Electronic Records
Tax records can increasingly exist electronically.
The current statutory/administrative framework recognises:
electronic invoices;
electronic records;
electronic submission;
IRD access to electronic information.
Taxpayers should maintain electronic records with:
reliable backup;
access controls;
audit trail;
readable export;
document linkage.
A scanned invoice should not be stored in a way that makes it impossible to prove which accounting transaction it supports.
Foreign-language Documents
If a required record is not in Nepali or English, Section 81 allows IRD to require a Nepali translation prepared by a legally recognised translator at the taxpayer's cost.
This is especially relevant for:
foreign contracts;
invoices;
technical agreements;
loan agreements;
royalty agreements;
transfer-pricing documents.
3. Record and filing defaults
Failure to Keep Required Records
Section 117 imposes administrative fees where the taxpayer fails to maintain required Section 81 records.
IRD's current FAQ describes the charge by reference to the statutory percentage/minimum formula and separately warns taxpayers that failure to maintain required documents attracts a fee.
Calculate the fee from the applicable Section 117 formula, using the type and duration of default and the statutory base. One fixed figure does not cover every case.
Late Income Tax Return
Failure to file an annual income-tax return on time can attract a Section 117 fee.
IRD currently explains the ordinary annual-return failure fee as the higher amount determined through the statutory formula involving:
the applicable percentage of the specified assessable-income base; or
the monthly minimum charge.
Therefore:
A nil accounting profit does not automatically mean there is no late-filing consequence.
Estimated Tax Statement Default
Section 117(1)(क) imposes a fee for failure to submit the estimated-income statement required by section 95(1). The current formula is NPR 5,000 per statement or 0.01% of the assessable-income amount stated in that statement, whichever is higher. This is not a general monthly charge.
Keep this filing fee separate from section 118 interest on an instalment-tax shortfall and section 119 interest on overdue tax. Identify the actual filing obligation and the applicable income year before calculating the charge.
Late e-TDS Return
If a withholding person fails to submit the Section 90 withholding return, Section 117 imposes a separate fee based on the amount required to be withheld and the duration of delay.
The current Act translation specifies 2.5% per year of the amount required to be withheld, applied according to the statutory monthly/part-month mechanism.
This is in addition to the consequences of not actually depositing withheld tax.
4. Payment interest and short instalments
Late Tax Payment Interest — Section 119
Where tax is not paid by the prescribed due date, Section 119 applies interest at the normal interest rate for the period the tax remains due.
IRD currently states:
Normal interest rate = 15% per annum
and explains that interest is calculated for each month or part of a month from the payment due date until payment.
Filing Extension Does Not Remove Interest
Section 119 expressly provides that an extension of time to file a return under Section 98 does not automatically provide relief from late-payment interest.
IRD confirms this treatment.
Therefore:
Return filing deadline extension ≠ interest-free tax payment extension.
Instalment Tax Shortfall — Section 118
Section 118 applies where advance/instalment tax has been materially underpaid compared with the required estimated amount.
This is separate from Section 119 ordinary overdue-tax interest.
Taxpayers should therefore:
forecast taxable income;
update estimates;
reconcile TDS credits;
avoid deliberately low estimates.
5. False statements and reconciliations
False or Misleading Statements
Administrative consequences can also arise where a taxpayer makes a false/misleading statement.
IRD currently describes:
Error without intentional/negligent conduct
Charge broadly equal to 50% of the tax shortfall.
Intentional/negligent false statement
Charge broadly equal to 100% of the tax shortfall.
Separate criminal provisions can also apply in serious cases.
Therefore paying the administrative charge does not necessarily eliminate all other legal exposure.
Records Should Match Across Tax Systems
A robust tax file should reconcile: Financial statements
↔ Income Tax Return
↔ VAT
↔ e-TDS
↔ Bank
↔ Payroll
↔ Customs/import records
↔ OCR/company records where relevant
Large unexplained differences are a common source of tax queries.
6. Digital tax file and final checks
Recommended Digital Tax File
Permanent master
PAN/VAT certificate
incorporation/registration
tax-clearance history
legal agreements
major asset records
Annual file
trial balance
financial statements
tax computation
return
tax depreciation
tax-loss schedule
TDS reconciliation
advance tax
payment vouchers
VAT reconciliation
supporting schedules
Transaction evidence
invoices
contracts
bank evidence
payroll
import/customs documents
related-party documents
Compliance Checklist
Maintain transaction records
retain invoices
retain bank/payment evidence
retain contracts
Maintain tax-depreciation schedule
Maintain tax-loss schedule
Reconcile TDS
Reconcile VAT
retain filed returns
retain IRD notices
Preserve records for statutory minimum period
Preserve litigation/asset records longer where needed
Back up electronic data
Verify records are retrievable
translate foreign documents where IRD requires
Common Errors
Destroying records immediately after receiving tax clearance
Assuming scanned files need no backup
Treating late filing, late tax payment and inadequate record keeping as one penalty
Believing return-extension approval also suspends interest
Failing to reconcile TDS/VAT with financial statements
Relying only on the accounting software without retaining underlying evidence
Further guidance and practical checks
Tax documentation should be designed for future verification, not merely for preparation of the current year's return. Records may remain relevant after the ordinary five-year period where litigation, assets, losses or continuing transactions are involved.
Official sources
Before using this guide
Source review: 12 October 2026
The sources support the scope of this general guide. Before applying it, check the actual entity, transaction, reporting period and any later amendment.
Checks for your case
- Apply the cited provisions to the actual entity, transaction and period. Use the relevant authority’s current forms, instructions and accepted decision for a real filing.
Latest update
- 13 October 2026
Editor: C.M. & Associates
Grouped the article into major reading sections while preserving the original section links. Reviewed the complete article wording and its stated source scope. Clarified source labels and public wording where needed. Earlier source-check dates and any stated limitations remain applicable.