Sector & Operational Compliance
Income Tax Refund in Nepal — 5-Year Claim Period & Procedure
Applicable framework: Income Tax Act, 2058 — Section 113 and Income Tax Rules Current-year amendment: Finance Act 2083
Where a taxpayer has paid tax exceeding the amount legally payable, the excess may be:
adjusted against other tax liabilities; or
refunded according to Section 113.
Finance Act 2083 materially increases the refund application period from: 2 years → 5 years.
Where a proper refund application is made under Section 113(3), IRD is generally required to refund the determined amount within: 60 days
of the application.
1. Excess tax and adjustment
What Is an Income Tax Refund?
A refund can arise where tax paid exceeds the final tax liability.
Examples include:
excess advance instalment tax;
excess TDS;
excessive self-assessment payment;
amended assessment in taxpayer's favour;
successful administrative review;
successful Revenue Tribunal/court decision;
duplicated tax payment.
Example
Final income-tax liability: NPR 1,000,000
Advance tax paid: NPR 800,000
Eligible TDS: NPR 350,000
Total tax paid/credited: NPR 1,150,000
Excess: NPR 150,000 subject to reconciliation and any other outstanding tax liabilities.
IRD May First Adjust the Excess
Section 113 allows IRD to apply the excess against other tax payable by the taxpayer.
Example
Excess FY 2083/84 tax: NPR 150,000
Outstanding prior-year assessment: NPR 100,000
IRD may apply: NPR 100,000 against arrears leaving possible cash refund: NPR 50,000
Therefore:
Excess tax shown in one year does not automatically mean the whole amount will be paid in cash.
2. Application and statutory claim period
Refund Application
Where the taxpayer seeks refund of the excess amount, Section 113(3) requires an application in the prescribed manner.
Rule 36 requires supporting documentation establishing that the amount claimed was paid in excess, together with other documents required by IRD.
Typical documents may include:
refund application;
income-tax return;
tax computation;
TDS certificates;
advance-tax vouchers;
payment evidence;
financial statements;
assessment/review decision;
bank details;
reconciliation schedule.
New FY 2083/84 — Five-Year Claim Period
Before Finance Act 2083, Section 113(4) generally required the refund claim within: 2 years from the latest of the specified statutory dates.
Finance Act 2083 changes this to: 5 years.
This is a major taxpayer-favourable amendment.
However:
Five years should not be counted blindly from the tax-payment date.
Section 113 specifies the relevant statutory reference dates, and the period runs from the latest applicable date.
The refund file should therefore document the limitation calculation.
Common Reference Dates
Depending on why the refund arose, relevant statutory dates can include matters such as:
end of the income year;
date the excess tax was paid;
the court-decision date, where relevant under section 113(4);
The precise Section 113(4) clause applicable to the taxpayer should be identified.
3. Processing and delayed-refund interest
Refund Processing Period
Where a proper Section 113(3) application is filed, the Department generally must refund the amount determined refundable within: 60 days from the application date.
Maintain evidence of the exact application date.
Interest on Delayed Refund
The Income Tax Act provides for interest consequences where a refund required under the statutory framework is not made within the prescribed period.
The applicable rate and precise commencement should be confirmed for the relevant case/year before calculating a refund-interest claim.
Keep a separate calculation of:
Tax Refund Interest Calculator
rather than hard-code an old annual rate into the permanent article.
4. TDS mismatches and appeal outcomes
Excess TDS
A common refund case arises where customers deduct substantial TDS from a business but the final annual tax liability is lower.
Example: Tax liability:
NPR 500,000
TDS credits: NPR 800,000
Potential excess: NPR 300,000
Before seeking refund:
reconcile every TDS entry;
ensure customers filed correct PAN;
ensure TDS appears in IRD records;
remove duplicate/unverified credits;
reconcile outstanding tax.
Wrong PAN / Unmatched TDS
A taxpayer may have a valid withholding certificate but the amount may not appear correctly in the IRD system because:
payer used wrong PAN;
e-TDS was not verified;
wrong income year;
wrong revenue heading;
payer failed to file;
data-entry error.
The problem should ideally be corrected at the withholding-source level before claiming refund.
Refund After Successful Appeal
Where Administrative Review, Revenue Tribunal or court proceedings reduce the tax assessment, the taxpayer may have paid/deposited more than the finally determined liability.
The resulting excess should be reconciled under Section 113.
Maintain:
assessment order;
review decision;
Tribunal/court judgment;
deposit vouchers;
final liability reconciliation.
5. Refund or adjustment: worked example
Refund vs Adjustment
The taxpayer should distinguish:
Refund
Cash/transfer returned to taxpayer.
Adjustment
Excess tax set off against another tax liability.
Sometimes adjustment can be faster and commercially preferable if another liability is already due.
Refund Calculation Example
Self-assessment tax: NPR 600,000
Advance tax: NPR 500,000
TDS: NPR 250,000
Total tax paid/credited: NPR 750,000
Final tax liability: NPR 600,000
Excess: NPR 150,000
Prior tax arrears: NPR 40,000
Potential refundable balance after adjustment: NPR 110,000 subject to IRD verification.
6. Checklist and current claim-period clarification
Refund Application Checklist
Identify origin of excess tax
Reconcile filed return
Reconcile advance tax
Reconcile TDS
Check IRD taxpayer ledger
Check prior-year arrears
Check assessment balances
Calculate refund amount
Determine five-year limitation date
Prepare Rule 36 documents
File application
retain filing evidence
Calendar 60-day processing period
Follow up with IRD
Calculate delayed-refund interest if applicable
Reconcile refund/adjustment in books
Common Errors
Assuming five years always starts from the tax-payment date
Claiming TDS that does not appear against the taxpayer's PAN
Ignoring prior-year liabilities that IRD can adjust
Failing to retain proof of refund application date
Using the old two-year refund period for FY 2083/84
Confusing VAT refund procedures with Income Tax Section 113 refund
Further guidance and practical checks
Tax refund claims should be reconciled from the taxpayer's complete IRD ledger before filing. The five-year Finance Act 2083 amendment materially improves the claim window, but the statutory starting date still needs to be identified correctly for each case.
The five-year refund claim period
Finance Act 2083 extends section 113’s claim period to five years. Under section 113(4), count from the latest of the specified income-year end, the excess-payment date and the court-decision date. A generic assessment or reassessment date is not a listed starting point. Establish the actual statutory date before testing timeliness.
Official sources
Before using this guide
Source review: 12 October 2026
The sources support the scope of this general guide. Before applying it, check the actual entity, transaction, reporting period and any later amendment.
Checks for your case
- Apply the cited provisions to the actual entity, transaction and period. Use the relevant authority’s current forms, instructions and accepted decision for a real filing.
Latest update
- 13 October 2026
Editor: C.M. & Associates
Grouped the article into major reading sections while preserving the original section links. Reviewed the complete article wording and its stated source scope. Clarified source labels and public wording where needed. Earlier source-check dates and any stated limitations remain applicable.